By Kristin Evans, VP, Marketing, Constant
Credit union owners recently weighed in on Circuit's Summer Owner Meeting survey, voting on the priorities they think will matter most this year. Member retention intelligence came out on top, ahead of winning the future member and protecting members from elder financial abuse. That result tracks with what I hear directly from the credit unions we work with, and it lands right as the New York Fed's latest household debt report flagged new delinquencies for auto loans and credit cards as running at elevated levels, even as the overall delinquency rate held roughly steady.
When credit unions bring up retention with us, the conversation almost always starts with the member who already called in upset, or the one who just closed an account. Those conversations matter, and they get attention because they're loud. But the members I think about most are the ones who never called at all.
Indirect lending is a good example of what I mean. Point Predictive's analysis of NCUA call report data found that credit unions have been pulling back from indirect lending in part because it has historically carried higher delinquency rates than direct lending relationships. That tracks with the broader national trend too: the same Fed report found the share of auto debt transitioning into serious delinquency, 90 days or more past due, ticked up slightly year over year to 3.00 percent in the second quarter of 2026.
Indirect members are also the segment many credit unions struggle to engage, because there often isn’t a direct relationship to build on: no branch visit, no loan officer, and in many cases, no interaction with the credit union's own app at all. A lot of indirect auto loans are serviced through a third-party platform tied to the dealer relationship, so the member may be logging in regularly, just not to anything branded as the credit union. That absence of a relationship means these members often don't know a safety net exists at all, let alone where to find one.
That’s actually a bigger problem than it sounds, and it isn’t limited to indirect members. Most credit unions already have some kind of safety net for a member who hits a rough month, whether that's a skip-a-pay option, a due date change, or a short deferment, but those programs tend to be buried behind a form on a website the member has no reason to visit unless they already know to look for it. A member can't ask for help they don't know exists, and for indirect members, who may never interact with the credit union’s website or app in the first place, that visibility problem runs even deeper.
There's a second piece of this that doesn't get talked about enough. Needing to defer a payment is personal, usually tied to something like a job loss, a medical bill, or just a rough stretch, and most members would rather not explain that to another person, even a friendly one. That's a big reason we built our skip-a-pay tool to run end-to-end without a human in the loop unless the member wants one. Given the choice, most people would rather handle a hard month on their own.
We're also careful not to pretend the tool is a person. Members know they're talking to an AI agent, and that transparency seems to work in our favor. People tend to give a bot more patience when something goes wrong than they'd give a human they're already frustrated with, and for a conversation this sensitive, not having to perform a friendly human interaction makes the tool easier to use, not harder.
Loan servicing is also one of the last parts of the credit union to get automated in a way members can actually use on their own, well behind where origination has landed. Most still can’t offer that kind of self-service: talk to 50 credit unions about whether a member can resolve something like a due date change or a deferment entirely on their own, in digital banking or over the phone, without waiting on a call center queue, and I'd guess fewer than ten can say yes.
One comment on Circuit's post about the survey results stuck with me. A member pointed out that retention becomes a much more useful idea once credit unions move past measuring what members are doing and start asking why their behavior is changing. I'd apply that same shift to delinquency data specifically. A rising delinquency number on its own doesn't tell a credit union much. Knowing that a chunk of those members are indirect, may never interact with the credit union's own digital banking app, and have no idea a skip-a-pay option exists, tells a credit union exactly where to step in.
Retention intelligence, if it's going to mean more than a dashboard, has to start further upstream than most credit unions currently take it. That means knowing which members are at risk, and making sure the member who's about to fall behind actually has an easy, private way to fix it before they ever show up as a data point. A safety net only works as a retention strategy if the member finds it in time to use it, and for a lot of indirect members right now, that's still the piece missing.
Connect to Constant to learn more.